Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:00 wrolle
An insurer issued a homeowner’s policy that covered collectible historical documents. the documents, valued at and insured for $70,000, were lost in a fire that destroyed the home. prior to paying the homeowner, the insurer received a demand from a third party that the insurer pay the $70,000 to the third party. the third party contended that the documents had been stolen from the third party. the insurer and third party were citizens of the same state, while the homeowner was a citizen of a different state. the insurer would like to file a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court for the state of which the homeowner is a citizen. although this state has a long-arm statute, neither that statute nor the general service of process rules would permit service of process on the third party. the insurer does not wish to deposit the $70,000 with the court or post a bond pending resolution of this matter. of the following, which is a valid reason for advising against the filing of a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court? adiversity of citizenship does not exist between the insurer and the third party.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, Tinker2019
Why do boys think i'm so pretty when i'm the ugliest thing that's walked this planet
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00, afropenguin7371
 following the agreement that was reached in the treaty of indian springs in 1825, chief william mcintosh lost his life. why did this happen
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00, cuthbertson157
How much time on average do americans currently spend watching tv and videos per day?
Answers: 2
An insurer issued a homeowner’s policy that covered collectible historical documents. the document...
Mathematics, 03.06.2022 23:50
Spanish, 04.06.2022 01:00
Mathematics, 04.06.2022 01:00
Mathematics, 05.06.2022 01:30
Mathematics, 05.06.2022 01:50
History, 05.06.2022 02:10