Which statement best describes the cause of the zulu war of 1879? a) the zulu were threatened by egyptian forces. b) the boers fought against zulu invasion at blood river. c) the zulu attempted to resist submitting to british rule. d) the british attempted to send the zulu to india as slaves. this is on usatestprep.

What are the six basic purposes of government as outlined in the preamble to the constitution?

Will give brainliest to the correct answer no randoms the pope cannot forgive any guilt, except by declaring that it has been forgiven by godand by giving in to god's forgiveness. therefore those preachers of in dulgences are in error, who say that by the pope'sindulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved. christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does abetter work than buying indulgences. the excerpt above is from martin luther's ninety-five theses. luther posting the ninety-fivetheses is traditionally considered the beginning of the

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?