subject
Social Studies, 05.07.2019 04:00 Pizzapegasus1

Which scenario describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent? a. a federal judge rules that newspapers may be censored during an emergency despite earlier courts declaring this practice unconstitutional b. a state supreme court overturns a defendant’s conviction on the grounds that the judge for his first trial demonstrated a bias against him c. a court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses. d. a defendant convicted of a federal crime appeals to the supreme court, but his request is denied

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30, QTpieNay
You swipe your debit card too many times. what additional charges should you expect?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00, herchellann302
The most effective way to provide children with safety messages is to
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20, issacbeecherpebpyl
Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, GingerSnaps
The police of a resort town discovered that a well-known cat burglar was currently living in town under an assumed name. to try to catch her in the act of burglary, an undercover officer approached the burglar with a plan for a burglary. the undercover officer told the burglar that he knew who she was and that he had a plan to steal jewels from someone staying in one of the town's resorts. the burglar initially refused the offer; however, after lengthy cajoling, she finally agreed to the plan. as the time for the burglary drew near, the burglar had second thoughts. three hours before the theft was scheduled to take place, the burglar called the police and told them of the plan. she told them that she was not going to show up, but that her cohort (the undercover officer) would be there, and told them how to recognize the undercover officer. is the burglar guilty of conspiracy at common law?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which scenario describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent? a. a federal ju...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 19.05.2021 20:50