How was darius able to maintain control of such a large empire select all that apply? a. he forced provinces to tributes they were unable to afford. b.he gave local rulers some control over their goverment. c.he established a different currency for each of the provinces. d.he adopted a monotheistic religion. e. he founded the construction of across his empire.

C). He established a different currency for each of the provinces.

D). He adopted a monotheistic religion.

E). He founded the construction of across his empire.

Explanation:

Darius was able to take a hold of such a huge empire as he established the 'provincial government' and employed 'provincial governors' to ensure effective control over these provinces as the empire was too large to be handled alone.

As per the question, Darius 'established a separate currency for each province' that would assist him to have authority over them. Then, he adopted a 'monotheistic religion' that united these provinces in a single thread. 'The construction of across his empire' to ensure the safety and security of his empire from any kind of potential attack or intrusion. Thus, options C, D, and E are the correct answers.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.