subject
Social Studies, 07.07.2019 19:30 michelle230

In the cold war end it what happened to the soviet union

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, rosie20052019
Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:30, NeverEndingCycle
The year is 1776. the family of philosopher john locke has brought a lawsuit against thomas jefferson for copying locke's ideas. locke's family claim that jefferson's "declaration of independence" plagiarizes locke's ideas from two treatises on government. you are the judge ruling on the case. you must research how jefferson's ideas compare to locke's and determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of stealing locke's ideas. your paragraph opinion (a court document explaining how you arrived at your decision on a case) should contain the following: explain at least 2 ideas of jefferson and locke that are similar explain at least 1 idea of jefferson that is different from locke's determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of plagiarism explain why or why not ~~ you don't have to do the work for me but i really would like some with this, you ! ( if you would like to do it for me that's great too : )
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30, avilaaa
Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00, toxsicity
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the cold war end it what happened to the soviet union...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 01.06.2021 23:40
Konu
Mathematics, 01.06.2021 23:40