Laverne goes to a movie theater to watch her favorite movie. about halfway through the movie, she becomes aware of an overpowering hunger for popcorn. what she doesn't realize is that throughout the first part of the movie, a message saying "eat popcorn! " was repeatedly flashed on the screen at a speed too fast for her to be consciously aware of it. if her desire for popcorn is due to that message, she is responding to

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What was the direct cause of the u. s. entry into world war ii? a. the bombing of pearl harbor b. the invasion of poland by germany c. the capture of belgium by germany d. the battle of britain

Because of the housing bubble, many houses are now selling for much less than their selling price just two to three years ago. there is evidence that homeowners with virtually identical houses tend to ask for more if they paid more for the house. what fallacy are they making?