Every argument should appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos mainstream beliefs fallacious logic extreme perspectives

The correct answer is A) ethos, logos, and pathos.

Every argument should appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos.

Every time you address an audience yo have to convince them about your ideas. That is why pro speakers do. So you have a combination of elements that help you address the audience successfully.

Pathos is an emotional appeal. The speaker appeals to emotion in order to convince the audience. Logos is the logic, the rational appeal. You use arguments to convince the audience. And then, you have Ethos, the appeal to the image and reputation of the speaker.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.