Which of these choices is not a cultural influence on our wellness?
a. attitude
b. behavior
c. hereditary diseases
d. media

The answer is C. Hereditary diseases is not a cultural choice on our wellness, because it’s genetically passed to us.

EXPLANATION

Wellness is also known as well-being. Well-being refers to the condition of an individual or a group. If the condition of an individual or a group is categorized as positive, it can be concluded that they experienced well-being. Well-being includes a lot of dimensions, such as mental, social, and physical well-being. To make it more understandable, well-being is something more than just the traditional definition of health. It has a lot of dimensions that all can affect the well-being of a person.  

If a person has good physical health, the person will achieve physical vitality. If a person has a good mental state, then the person will have mental alacrity. The last one is having good social health will make a person achieve social satisfaction. If one person has physical vitality, mental alacrity, and social satisfaction, then the person can be categorized as having high well-being in life. Other things that can improve well-being is personal fulfillment and a sense of accomplishment.

Well-being is the approach of personal health by promoting the practice of health-promoting lifestyle behaviors. Well-being is the definition of having good mental, physical, and social health. A person can’t be called experiencing well-being if the person only has one or two good dimensions of health, it needs all three good dimensions to experience well-being.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Brain area for higher mental processes:  

Physical education:  

KEYWORD: wellness, well-being, cultural influence

Subject: Social Studies

Class: 10-12

Subchapter: Wellness

answer; i believe the best and correct answer is stronger bonds between the nations of africa;

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )