Under ohio's state constitution, the ohio environmental protection agency issues a new rule, the polk county commission approves a new property tax measure, and the professors and students at ohio law school publish the results of their most recent legal research. in this scenario, primary sources of law do not include:

I believe the answer is: The result of legal scholars' research

Source of laws refers to the origin of binding rules that become a basis for a government to rule over its territory. To be a source of laws, the result of the researches must be tested by different variety of experts from different fields to proof its validity, so scholar's research would most likely cannot be included.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

an informal structure in a bureaucracy would be something like so-called "office politics". where there's a formal structure set up for the organization, but then an informal subculture as well that has a way of organizing the bureaucracy further. this can be positive because it sets up an added degree of organization, albeit informal, within the bureaucracy.