One reason some argue that campaign financing should be restricted it is because supporting a candidate is considered free speech. the constitution limits the influence of citizens on elections. limitations to ensure the wealthy are less influential. restrictions allow for greater influence by fewer corporations.

The correct option: Limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.

The purpose of controlling or restricting campaign financing is to leave the wealthy with less influence so that the less wealthy can also participate and have decision-making power over their candidates. Those who have greater purchasing power can put pressure on that candidate that he financed to achieve only personal purposes, for example. And this can not happen because it is a breakdown of the democratic process, which all (rich and poor) have to have their interests defended regardless of who gave more money or gave no money for the campaign.

In other words, the candidate has to represent the people, not private interests of a group. That is why campaigns have to be monitored regarding financing proposoals. We can not miss the strategic point of democratizing the entire electoral process.