With regard to peterson's categories of events that instigate conflict, are relatively trivial events that become irritating with repetition. cumulative annoyances criticisms rebuffs illegitimate demands

With regard to peterson's categories of events that instigate conflict, "Cumulative Annoyances" are relatively trivial events that become irritating with repetition.

Cumulative annoyance is a working of frustration or anger that happens after some time, in the long run bringing about a contention association. Cumulative annoyance can develop like a pressure cooker, and as it develops, the force of the contention likewise assembles. Criticism and requests can likewise play into aggregate disturbance.

A decent system for overseeing cumulative annoyance is to screen your level of irritation and once in a while let some steam out of the pressure cooker by preparing through your dissatisfaction with an outsider or straightforwardly tending to what is annoying you with the source.

so, colonists did not want to pay any taxes.  

colonists did not consider themselves british citizens.  

colonists felt no sense of obligation to britain.  

colonists objected to violations of their natural rights. are the answer choices?

i am a priest who cares deeply about the church. i have been called here to explain my views on indulgences and other proposed reforms. i would like to explain why my views are consistent with the bible and are correct.