Social Studies, 19.07.2019 16:30 kristieroth1

What was the basis for freud's development of his theory of the oedipus conflict?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30, juanitarodrigue

Look at the map of cities in the united states at the turn of the twentish century what impact did railroads have on cities across the united states at the turn of the twentish century

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30, 130005401

Catherine sat down will all of her income details from the past year to calculate the total income she had in that period. after she created a consolidated income statement, she deducted some tax-exempt income details from the statement. what term would catherine use for this final income calculation?

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:10, gtsaeg7277

Tracey is a financial planner who received his cfp designation. tracey does not have any other designations or licenses. although tracey's expertise is investment planning, he is anxious to expand his client base and is willing to assist clients with any area of financial planning. over the last month tracey engaged in the following activities with troy, a new client. a. during the initial meeting, tracey collected personal data about troy including the estate planning documents troy had previously executed. b. during the second meeting, tracey recommended the use of a trust to fulfill some of troy's estate planning goals. c. troy called tracey one afternoon and asked if tracey could explain the probate process to him, which tracey promptly did. d. tracey downloaded a copy of a generic will from the internet, filled in troy's information and gave the document to troy to be executed. of the activities above, which would be considered the unauthorized practice of law?

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50, Betzabeth671

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.