At bottom, the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. –Justice John Paul Stevens, Dissenting Opinion, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission Which statement describes Justice Stevens’s belief about the outcome of the case? Corporate money would make elections more likely to reflect the public will. Corporate money would make elections less likely to reflect the public will. Corporate money would have no influence on elections. Public opinion and attitudes have changed since the times of Theodore Roosevelt.