If khim is 18 years old and his brother is third of his age , now the age khim is 36 what is the age of his brother?

Khim’s brother is six years younger than him. 18 multiplied by 1/3 (0.33) is 5.94 but since no one can exactly be 5.94 years old, round it to 6. The reason that you would multiply is because it makes the number smaller, which is exactly what he problem is asking for. Do the same process with the age of 36 instead of 18.

24.

If I understand the question correctly, Khim’s brother was a third of Khim’s age when Khim was 18. 1/3(18) = 6. 18-6 =12. No matter what, Khim’s brother will be 12 years younger than Khim. So when Khim is 36, his brother is 24.

The paced decision model is a tool that can be used in a variety of situationsit should clarify one's alternative and criteriapaced decision-making processused to solve problems in a rational, systematic way- state the problem- list the alternatives- identify criteria- evaluate alternatives- make a decisionstep 1 - problem: the first step is to state the problem. what car should i buy? step 2 - alternatives: list some likely alternativesstep 3 - criteria: the next step is to establish criteria - what is the most important to you. (these criteria need to be state din positive terms, i.e., stated as you what you want.) ex costs less than $4000; gets at least 25 mpg,; seats at least 4; has ac;   step 4 - evaluate each alternative by comparing it to criterion. if an alternative meets a criterion, pus a + in that box - if not put a -. at the end look to see which alternative meets your most important criteria. (some criteria will be more important than others. those may be given greater weight. and, if an alternative costs more than $4000, it probably won't matter if there is a + in all the other boxes.)step 5 - decide: based on the insights gained, make a choice. be sure to explain that it won't always be the one with the most +'s - since some criteria count more than othersthe strength of this tool lies in the ability of each student to determine their own criteria for evaluation