Physics, 23.07.2019 23:30 braxton24

Two point charges are 10.0cm apart and have charges of 2.0uc and -2.0uc, respectively. what is the magnitude of the electric field at the midpoint between the two charges?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

The electric field generated by a point charge is given by:
$E= k_e \frac{Q}{r^2}$
where
$k_e = 8.99 \cdot 10^9 Nm^2 C^{-2}$ is the Coulomb's constant
Q is the charge
r is the distance from the charge

We want to know the net electric field at the midpoint between the two charges, so at a distance of r=5.0 cm=0.05 m from each of them.

Let's calculate first the electric field generated by the positive charge at that point:
$E_1=k_e \frac{Q_1}{r^2}=(8.99 \cdot 10^9 Nm^2C^{-2}) \frac{(2.0 \cdot 10^{-6} C)}{(0.05 m)^2} =+7.19 \cdot 10^6 N/C$
where the positive sign means its direction is away from the charge.

while the electric field generated by the negative charge is:
$E_2=k_e \frac{Q_1}{r^2}=(8.99 \cdot 10^9 Nm^2C^{-2}) \frac{(-2.0 \cdot 10^{-6} C)}{(0.05 m)^2} =-7.19 \cdot 10^6 N/C$
where the negative sign means its direction is toward the charge.

If we assume that the positive charge is on the left and the negative charge is on the right, we see that E1 is directed to the right, and E2 is directed to the right as well. This means that the net electric field at the midpoint between the two charges is just the sum of the two fields:
$E_{tot} =E_1 + E_2 = 7.19 \cdot 10^6 N/C+7.19 \cdot 10^6 N/C=1.44 \cdot 10^7 N/C$

Answer from: Quest

Uzydywvdjbs hshazhejhdi

Answer from: Quest

relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them. more precisely, “relativism” covers views which maintain that—at a high level of abstraction—at least some class of things have the properties they have (e.g., beautiful, morally good, epistemically justified) not simpliciter, but only relative to a given framework of assessment (e.g., local cultural norms, individual standards), and correspondingly, that the truth of claims attributing these properties holds only once the relevant framework of assessment is specified or supplied. relativists characteristically insist, furthermore, that if something is only relatively so, then there can be no framework-independent vantage point from which the matter of whether the thing in question is so can be established.

relativism has been, in its various guises, both one of the most popular and most reviled philosophical doctrines of our time. defenders see it as a harbinger of tolerance and the only ethical and epistemic stance worthy of the open-minded and tolerant. detractors dismiss it for its alleged incoherence and uncritical intellectual permissiveness. debates about relativism permeate the whole spectrum of philosophical sub-disciplines. from ethics to epistemology, science to religion, political theory to ontology, theories of meaning and even logic, philosophy has felt the need to respond to this heady and seemingly subversive idea. discussions of relativism often also invoke considerations relevant to the very nature and methodology of philosophy and to the division between the so-called “analytic and continental” camps in philosophy. and yet, despite a long history of debate going back to plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has. this entry attempts to provide a broad account of the many ways in which “relativism” has been defined, explained, defended and criticized.

explanation:

Other questions on the subject: Physics

Physics, 22.06.2019 09:30, kaleahlove13

Suppose you increase your walking speed from 7 m/s to 13 m/s in a period of 2 s. what is your acceleration?

Answers: 2

continue

Physics, 22.06.2019 19:30, rprest00

Amass m = 74 kg slides on a frictionless track that has a drop, followed by a loop-the-loop with radius r = 18.4 m and finally a flat straight section at the same height as the center of the loop (18.4 m off the ground). since the mass would not make it around the loop if released from the height of the top of the loop (do you know why? ) it must be released above the top of the loop-the-loop height. (assume the mass never leaves the smooth track at any point on its path.) 1. what is the minimum speed the block must have at the top of the loop to make it around the loop-the-loop without leaving the track? 2. what height above the ground must the mass begin to make it around the loop-the-loop? 3. if the mass has just enough speed to make it around the loop without leaving the track, what will its speed be at the bottom of the loop? 4. if the mass has just enough speed to make it around the loop without leaving the track, what is its speed at the final flat level (18.4 m off the ground)? 5. now a spring with spring constant k = 15600 n/m is used on the final flat surface to stop the mass. how far does the spring compress?

Answers: 3

continue

Physics, 22.06.2019 22:30, aesthetickait

When you hold a rectangular object, how does the area of the side that is resting on your hand affect the pressure and the force that the object exerts?

Answers: 3

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 02:00, AgentPangolin

The gravitational force between pluto and charon is 3.61 × 1018 n. pluto has a mass of 1.3 × 1022 kg, which is only slightly greater than charon’s mass of 1.6 × 1021 kg. how far apart are pluto and charon? 2.0 × 107 m 2.4 × 1012 m 3.8 × 1014 m 5.8 × 1024 m

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Two point charges are 10.0cm apart and have charges of 2.0uc and -2.0uc, respectively. what is the m...