1 of 2 A student hypothesizes that if the first experiment were repeated at higher temperatures, the
brass
wire would have a larger expansion than the aluminum wire at 130°C. Use the results of the
xperiments
st
ant was
was
wn in Figure
first experiment and the data presented in Figure 1 to explain why the student's hypothesis is
UNSUPPORTED by the results of the experiment. As part of your explanation, give your own
ferent
he same rate
nts. The
prediction of the approximate expansions of the brass and aluminum wires at 130°C (ie what
would really happen)
a
à
07 250 Word Limit
<
Save/Exit
Nevt

(science)study the following ocean currents map. an ocean currents map is shown. on the map the locations for san diego, california and savannah, georgia are marked. there is a looping current from the north past san diego and a looping current from the south near savannah which statement is most likely correct about the average temperatures in san diego, california as compared to savannah, georgia? it is higher in savannah because of the cool ocean currents from the south. it is higher in savannah because of the warm ocean currents from the north. it is lower in san diego because of the warm ocean currents from the south. it is lower in san diego because of the cool ocean currents from the north.

Madison lives near the ocean. she’s formed a hypothesis that increased concentrations of salt in the air speeds the corrosion of certain metals. if madison plans to test this hypothesis, she will have to deal with the following variables in her experiment: dependent variable: independent variable: one possible confounding variable:

After identifying which method the theory relates better to, use the example of feyerabend to discuss why you think philosophy and science (and, philosophers and scientists) have theories and ideas that blend into one another. how are these two disciplines related?