Ana is planning to build an electrical circuit Before building it, she writes the statement, "f four batteries are connected to a light bulb, then the light bulb will burn longer than if two batteries are connected because more
battenes provide more energy"
Which best explains why Ana's statement is a hypothesis rather than a theory?
It is based on pror knowledge, but it has not been widely tested on her circuit.
It has been widely tested on her circuit, but it is not a factual statement
It is a factual statement, but it is not based on prior knowledge
It is a testable statement, but it cannot be replaced in the future.

Then the answer would be d then

    m₁v₁ + m₂v₂ = (m₁ + m₂)vmomentum is conserved.the left-hand side of the equation represents the momentum in the system before the collision.the right-hand side represents the momentum in the system after the collisionm₁ and v₁ represents the mass and the velocity of the physics blockm₂ and v₂ represents the mass and velocity of the ball of puttyv represents the final velocity of the combined mass.the question states the two masses stick together. they combined mass has its own velocity with the body mass the sum of the two objects' massestheir combined momentum is (m₁ + m₂)vto find the magitude of (m₁ + m₂)v, we need to add the vectors on the left-hand side of the equation: m₁v₁ + m₂v₂.note the diagram. i have positioned the vectors in accordance with their directions.the magnitude of the resultant can be calculated using the pythagorean theorem since this is a right triangle situation (north and west are perpendicular)|(m₁ + m₂)v| =  √[ (m₁v₁)² + (m₂v₂)² ]|(m₁ + m₂)v| =  √[ (1.5kg·8.0m/s)² + (0.40kg·20m/s)² ]|(m₁ + m₂)v| =  14.4 kg m/sfor two significant figures (assuming that 20m/s is two), this rounds to 14 kg m/s