Physics, 05.05.2020 03:07 emmalucilleblaha1995

An object is moving at a velocity of 30m/s. It accelerations to a velocity of 55m/s over a time of 12.5 m/s. What acceleration did it experience?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: frankgore8496

Acceleration = (change of speed) / (time for the change)

Change of speed = (speed at the end) - (speed at the beginning)

Change of speed = (55 m/s) - (30 m/s)

Change of speed = 25 m/s

Acceleration = (25 m/s) / (12.5 seconds)

Acceleration = 2 m/s²

Answer from: CateL1515

2m/s^2

Explanation:

Initial velocity(u)=30m/s

Final velocity(v)=55m/s

Time(t)=12.5s

Acceleration=?

Acceleration=(v-u)/t

Acceleration=(55-30)/12.5

Acceleration=25/12.5

Acceleration=2m/s^2

Answer from: Quest

quantum mechanics or quantum physics is physics of very small objects (particles) and physical entities.

quantum physics has some parallels to our macro world and some pretty unique ideas which theoretically and mathematically proven to be true even though we will never be able to access them because of our size.

there are many types of particles: subatomic, elementary etc.

subatomic means they are smaller than atom, elementary means they are at the very basis of everything.

subatomic particles are for eg. protons, neutrons but not electrons.

elementary particles are categorised into 3 groups by what they do.

these 3 groups are quarks, leptons and bosons.

light for example is a particle more precisely a photon a part of leptons.

proton (subatomic particle) is made out of 2 up quarks and 1 down quark each of these has a fractional charge like $\frac{1}{3}$ . (i crazy)

most famous scientist who contributed to this physics are:

max planckalbert einsteinerwin schrödingermany

the topic itself us understand a lot and will probably be vastly used in the future (quantum computers, understanding the big bang,

we also must not forget quantum effects like:

superposition (where 1 thing can be this and that at the same time),entanglement (where two particles are seemingly connected by some sort of unknown (or known) force, energy, matter (i know all that can be the same at least it was at the beginning)

and there is more. but probably too much for this answer to be consistent due to my average understanding of this topic.

hope this you understand quantum mechanics a little more. i'm not an expert in the topic (so don't be like wth if you are an expert) but i'm very interested in it.

anyways quantum physics is a very hard topic (harder than physics (perhaps)) therefore searching for every information there is about it and learning it is unfortunately impossible (you can only specialise into 1 - 3 things or more (perhaps

have fun and i wish you luck!

r3t40

Answer from: Quest

i think the answer would be b

Other questions on the subject: Physics

Physics, 22.06.2019 22:30, madisonvinson80

Am i correct on these two physics questions?

Answers: 2

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 01:30, smortandsons

)consider two positively charged particles, one of charge q0 (particle 0) fixed at the origin, and another of charge q1 (particle 1) fixed on the y-axis at (0,d1,0). what is the net force f⃗ on particle 0 due to particle 1?

Answers: 2

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 09:00, WintryTurtle

In the cores of extremely hot red giants, nuclear reactions convert helium to

Answers: 1

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 10:40, puzzledprincess8037

4.at 0 ºc, some amount of energy is required to change 1 kg of water from a solid into a liquid. if you had a 2 kg piece of ice, what effect would this have on the amount of thermal energy required to change the water from a solid to a liquid? it would require more energy to change solid water into liquid water because there are more molecules in this larger piece of ice. it would still require the same amount of energy to change solid water into liquid water because the entire piece of ice would still gain the same amount of energy in each case. it would require energy to be removed from the 2 kg piece of ice. the larger piece of ice already has more total energy than the smaller piece of ice, so energy must be removed for the ice to become liquid. it would require less energy to change solid water into liquid water because the energy would spread through the ice more quickly and the ice already has a larger total amount of energy because it is larger than a 1 kg piece of ice.

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

An object is moving at a velocity of 30m/s. It accelerations to a velocity of 55m/s over a time of 1...