Physics, 10.12.2019 01:31 mimithurmond03

During a very quick stop, a car decelerates at 6.8 m/s^2. assume the forward motion of the car corresponds to a positive direction for the rotation of the tires (and that they do not slip on the ) what is the angular acceleration of its 0.280-m-radius tires, assuming they do not slip on the pavement? (b) how many revolutions do the tires make before coming to rest, given their initial angular velocity is 95.0 rad/s ? (c) how long does the car take to stop completely? (d) what distance does the car travel in this time?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: brookealexis5768

-24.28571 rad/s²

29.57239 revolutions

3.91176 seconds

52.026478 m

Explanation:

a_t = Tangential acceleration = -6.8 m/s²

r = Radius of wheel = 0.28

$\omega_i$ = Initial angular velocity = 95 rad/s

$\theta$ = Angle of rotation

$\omega_f$ = Final angular velocity

t = Time taken

Angular acceleration is given by

$\alpha=\frac{a_t}{t}\\\Rightarrow \alpha=\frac{-6.8}{0.28}\\\Rightarrow \alpha=-24.28571\ rad/s^2$

The angular acceleration is -24.28571 rad/s²

$\omega_f^2-\omega_i^2=2\alpha \theta\\\Rightarrow \theta=\frac{\omega_f^2-\omega_i^2^2}{2\alpha}\\\Rightarrow \theta=\frac{0^2-95^2}{2\times -24.28571}\\\Rightarrow \theta=185.80885\ rad=185.80885\times \frac{1}{2\pi}\\\Rightarrow \theta=29.57239\ rev$

The number of revolutions is 29.57239

$\omega_f=\omega_i+\alpha t\\\Rightarrow t=\frac{\omega_f-\omega_i}{\alpha}\\\Rightarrow t=\frac{0-95}{-24.28571}\\\Rightarrow t=3.91176\ s$

The time it takes for the car to stop is 3.91176 seconds

Linear distance

$s=r\theta\\\Rightarrow s=0.28\times 185.80885\\\Rightarrow s=52.026478\ m$

The distance the car travels is 52.026478 m

Answer from: Quest

glass has been rated on the mohs scale as 5.5

Answer from: Quest

relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them. more precisely, “relativism” covers views which maintain that—at a high level of abstraction—at least some class of things have the properties they have (e.g., beautiful, morally good, epistemically justified) not simpliciter, but only relative to a given framework of assessment (e.g., local cultural norms, individual standards), and correspondingly, that the truth of claims attributing these properties holds only once the relevant framework of assessment is specified or supplied. relativists characteristically insist, furthermore, that if something is only relatively so, then there can be no framework-independent vantage point from which the matter of whether the thing in question is so can be established.

relativism has been, in its various guises, both one of the most popular and most reviled philosophical doctrines of our time. defenders see it as a harbinger of tolerance and the only ethical and epistemic stance worthy of the open-minded and tolerant. detractors dismiss it for its alleged incoherence and uncritical intellectual permissiveness. debates about relativism permeate the whole spectrum of philosophical sub-disciplines. from ethics to epistemology, science to religion, political theory to ontology, theories of meaning and even logic, philosophy has felt the need to respond to this heady and seemingly subversive idea. discussions of relativism often also invoke considerations relevant to the very nature and methodology of philosophy and to the division between the so-called “analytic and continental” camps in philosophy. and yet, despite a long history of debate going back to plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has. this entry attempts to provide a broad account of the many ways in which “relativism” has been defined, explained, defended and criticized.

explanation:

Other questions on the subject: Physics

Physics, 22.06.2019 02:30, erinolson07cats

The boy of mass 30 kg is at r1= 2 meters from the fulcrum. of the girl is 45 kg, at what r2 must she sit so that they are balanced ?

Answers: 3

continue

Physics, 22.06.2019 23:00, electrofy456

Which of the following is another term for a planned economy

Answers: 1

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 00:30, carma43

Discuss the difference between thermal energy and heat. (terrance) terrance, egolf, r., congdon, donald. physical science student text, 5th edition. bju press, 2014. vitalbook file.

Answers: 1

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 02:10, Nathaliasmiles

Find the steady-state temperature at the center of the plate = /2, = /2) for sums of w from n=1 to n=19 (only odd values). find the value of n for which the change in /2, /2) is less than 1% from the value at the previous n. at this point, we consider the solution converged. does the value of the temperature at the center seem reasonable? in this part, the values of x and y are constant scalar values. you should produce a plot of the value of n on the horizontal and the estimate of the temperature at the center of the plate on the vertical. b. using the value of n (or larger) that resulted in convergence in part (a), create a contourf plot of the temperature distribution across the entire plate. use enough spatial subdivisions to create a useful plot. comment on the results. hint: you need to determine what “x” and “y” values to use to make your t matrix. i recommend using a different number of x and y values. use enough x and y values so that the plot is “smooth”.

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

During a very quick stop, a car decelerates at 6.8 m/s^2. assume the forward motion of the car corre...