Ameterstick of uniform density hanging from a string at 0.7 m, had two masses of 0.50 kg and 1.00 kg hung at 0.1 m and 1.0 m respectively to obtain static equilibrium. a calculation for placement of the masses to obtain static equilibrium was done prior to the setup and it came out to: (0.5 kg x 9.8 n/kg x 0.6 m) – (1.00 kg x 9.8 n/kg x 0.3 m) = τnet = 0 n*m however, the setup failed and static equilibrium was not achieved. what do you think went wrong with the setup and/or equation?

The weight of the meter stick is missing in the equation and it would have provided counterclockwise torque.

Explanation:

Given that,

Length of string = 0.7 m

One mass = 0.50 kg

Another mass = 1.00 kg

Distance = 0.1 m

The given equation is

...(I)

The length of the meter stick  is

According to the question,

The equation will be

...(II)

On comparing equation (I) and (II)

So,  the missing term is the torque of self weight of stick.

Hence, The weight of the meter stick is missing in the equation and it would have provided counterclockwise torque.

what experimental evidence led scientists to change from the previous model to this one?

a few of the positive particles aimed at a gold foil seemed to bounce back.

the colors of light emitted from heated atoms had very specific energies.

experiments with water vapor showed that elements combine in specific proportions.

cathode rays were bent in the same way whenever a magnet was brought near them.