One hose can fill a pool in 12 hours. another hose can fill the same pool in 8 h

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Astudent draws two parabolas both parabolas cross the x axis at (-4,0) and (6,0) the y intercept of the first parabolas is (0,-12). the y intercept of the second parabola is (0,-24) what is the positive difference between the a values for the two functions that describe the parabolas

Match the following reasons with the statements given to create the proof. 1. do = ob, ao = oc sas 2. doc = aob given 3. triangle cod congruent to triangle aob vertical angles are equal. 4. 1 = 2, ab = dc if two sides = and ||, then a parallelogram. 5. ab||dc if alternate interior angles =, then lines parallel. 6. abcd is a parallelogram cpcte