Ascientist recently submitted a paper to a leading scientific journal. his data asset that a new drug combination is an effective treatment for strep throat. his study included six test subjects, four of whom received the new drug combination and two of whom received a placebo. all four subjects who received the drug combination were without symptoms after ten days of treatment. the paper was rejected. which of the following is the most likely reason for the rejection? a. the study was biased toward subjects receiving the drug combination. b. the study involves too small a sample size. c. the study involves too large a sample size. d. the study was biased toward subjects receiving the placebo.

Option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The following is the most likely reason for the rejection- the study involves too small a sample size. Only six persons were involved and this is a very small sample size. (his study included six test subjects, four of whom received the new drug combination and two of whom received a placebo.)

this is a very good question

step-by-step explanation:

i got a hair cut today from my mom not to flex just to flex kim jon un is one rad fellow i'd say you'd need to take the hairline in kinda like a box shape like someone rammed a lego brick into your head. from there you really need to take the top up keeping with that boxy aesthetic, finally coat the whole thing with gel if your country economics are failing or whatever you can just coat it with the starving children's food rations. about 5 orphans per strand is a good ratio. good luck with the fresh cut my dude