If p=m and n=16 in the equation m/45 = n/p, what is the value of m?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Will give brainliest immeadeately true or false: the origin woud be included in the solution set for the inequality: y< 2x-5

Cody ran nine miles on his first day of training. the next day he ran 1/8 that distance. how far did he run the second day?