Mathematics, 06.07.2019 18:00 kimilew
Damarcus says the number 24 over 6 belongs only to the set of rational numbers. explain his error
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:10, ieyaalzhraa
The random variable x is the number of occurrences of an event over an interval of ten minutes. it can be assumed that the probability of an occurrence is the same in any two-time periods of an equal length. it is known that the mean number of occurrences in ten minutes is 5.3. the appropriate probability distribution for the random variable
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, cabieses23
The formula for the lateral area of a right cone is la = rs, where r is the radius of the base and s is the slant height of the cone. which are equivalent equations?
Answers: 3
Damarcus says the number 24 over 6 belongs only to the set of rational numbers. explain his error...
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:47
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:47
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:47
History, 29.01.2020 08:47
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:47
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:47