Given: m || n and p is a transversal Prove: mAngle2 = mAngle7

Horizontal and parallel lines m and n are cut by transversal p. On line m where it intersects line p, 4 angles are created. Labeled clockwise, from uppercase left, the angles are: 1, 2, 4, 3. On line n where it intersects line p, 4 angles are created. Labeled clockwise, from uppercase left, the angles are 5, 6, 8, 7.
What is the missing reason in the proof?

Statement Reason
1. m || n and p is a transversal 1. given
2. ∠2 ≅ ∠3 2. ver. ∠s theorem
3. m∠2 = m∠3 3. def. of congruent
4. ∠3 ≅ ∠7 4. corr. ∠s theorem
5. m∠3 = m∠7 5. def. of congruent
6. m∠2 = m∠7 6. ?
corresponding angles theorem
alternate interior angles theorem
transitive property
subtraction property

Which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

What is the best way to answer questions with a x expression in the question. for example 3x + 10x=?

Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement. determine whether the contrapositive is true or false. if it is false, find a counterexample. a converse statement is formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional. a) a non-converse statement is not formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional. true b) a statement not formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional is a converse statement. false; an inverse statement is not formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional. c) a non-converse statement is formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional. false; an inverse statement is formed by negating both the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional. d) a statement not formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional is not a converse statement. true