Mathematics, 11.02.2022 18:10 brendancrow5927

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine’s statements and her conclusion? Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled. Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, mawawakaiii

Point $(x, y)$ is randomly picked from the rectangular region with vertices at $(0,,,2010),$ and $(0,2010)$. what is the probability that $x > 7y$? express your answer as a common fraction.

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30, Flaka2809

Asurvey of 45 teens found that they spent an average of 25.6 hours per week in front of a screen (television, computer, tablet, phone, based on the survey’s sample mean, which value could be the population mean? 2.3 hours 27.4 hours 75.3 hours 41.5 hours

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:30, ronaldo22

What rule describes a dilation with a scale factor of 4 and the center of dilation at the origin?

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:00, Tahliyah9420

What is the solution for the following system of equations? use any method to solve. y = -x +4 y = x - 2 a. ( 4 , -2) b. (2, 1) c. (3, 1) d.(3, -2)

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponenti...