LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects LLMN
Mathematics, 15.12.2021 05:10 maxi12312345
Consider the figure below.
Given: PM PN, LM 1MNMN 1 ON
LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects LLMN
Which of the following statements is enough to prove AMPLANPO?
A
If proving LP OP by Isosceles Triangle Theorem, and LM ON using substitution, then
AMPL a ANPO because of SSS.
B
If proving 2MPL 2 2NPO because they are vertical angles, and LMP LONP because of
definition of angle bisectors, then AMPL 2 ANPO because of ASA.
If proving LP = OP by Isosceles Triangle Theorem, and 2MPLZNPO because they are
vertical angles, then AMPL DANPO because of SAS.
If PM PN, LM 1 MNMN 1 ON, LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects ZIMN are given statements,
then there is enough to prove AMPLANPO by AAS.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, daeshawnc14
What’s -11-33k and factor each expression completely
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, recon12759
Is there an x intercept in the equation 60*1.15^x
Answers: 3
Consider the figure below.
Given: PM PN, LM 1MNMN 1 ON
LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects LLMN
LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects LLMN
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 02:58
Chemistry, 03.02.2020 02:58
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 02:58
Chemistry, 03.02.2020 02:58
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 02:58