Plz Answer ASAP! Thank you! In this course, we have studied two types of geometry: Euclidean and analytical. In Euclidean geometry, we’ve explored the relationships between points, lines, and planes without any numerical measurement. In analytical geometry, we’ve explored the relationship between algebra and geometry using positions of points in a Cartesian coordinate system. Which approach to geometry do you prefer and why? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would be more beneficial than the other?

thanks

Step-by-step explanation:

his chances of getting a coin of higher value is 4/19

step-by-step explanation:

answer: c, the green line

step-by-step explanation:

there is no black line, eliminate b.

simple interest implies periodic payments, but the red line shows no payments, eliminate d.

simple interest has equal payments. if paid say every day, the graph is about a straight line (actually a stairstep).

the yellow line is not straight, eliminate a.

check: the green line is straight, answer is c.

simple interest with positive interest rate gives a straight line sloping up to the right. green line:

g(t) = $100 + ($200-$100) ÷ (20 years) × (t years)

= $100 + (4%/year) × ($100)(t years)

incidentally, the yellow line curving upward represents continuously compounded interest

y = $100 × 2^(t years / (14 assuming the yellow line hits $200 at 14 years. 2^0 is 1, so y(0) = $100; 2^(14/14) is 2, so y(14) = $200.