In this course, we have studied two types of geometry: Euclidean and analytical. In Euclidean geometry, we’ve explored the relationships between points, lines, and planes without any numerical measurement.
In analytical geometry, we’ve explored the relationship between algebra and geometry using positions of points in a Cartesian coordinate system.

Which approach to geometry do you prefer and why? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would be more beneficial than the other?
(will mark you brainliest)

ou would have 12 of each

answer:   x = 3 + √11     and     x = 3 - √11

step-by-step explanation:

x² - 6x + 9 = 11

(x - 3)² = 11

x - 3 = ±√11

    x = 3 ± √11

x = 3 + √11     and     x = 3 - √11

the population of other specie of birds will decline or other specie of birds will find some alternate source of food to survive.

explanation:

according to the competitive exclusion principle, which is also known as gause's law, two specie living in the same niche and feeding on the same resource cannot co-exist stably.

as we have well studied the theory of natural selection which states that only those organisms survive which have better tendency to compete for food and adapt to the environmental conditions.

coming towards the question, what wi ll happen when one species outcompetes the other for the small fish , the other specie will not get enough food and will start to die or decline in population. eventually either other specie needs to find another alternative food source for itself or migrate at some other location where there is less competition otherwise it will just not exist anymore at that niche.

hope it !