Let fat be the explanatory variable and calories be the response variable; which scenario best describes ŷ = 121 + 1.42x? (4 points) a. The amount of calories in a cheeseburger increases by 1.42 for every one gram of fat. The calorie amount estimated by this model is 121 if there are zero grams of fat.
b. The amount of calories in a cheeseburger increases by 121 for every one gram of fat. The calorie amount estimated by this model is 1.42 if there are zero grams of fat.
c. The amount of fat in a cheeseburger increases by 121 grams for every one calorie. The fat amount estimated by this model is 1.42 grams if there are zero calories.
d. The amount of fat in a cheeseburger increases by 1.42 grams for every one calorie. The fat amount estimated by this model is 121 grams if there are zero calories.
e. The amount of calories in a cheeseburger increases by 1.42 when there are zero grams of fat. The calorie amount estimated by this model is 121 if there is one gram of fat.

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

sadsadsadsad

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

because 1/3 is a fraction. we can tell because there is a divisor symbol between the 1 and the 3. if we were to add 2 fractions together, we would add the numerators, which is the number on top, but not the denominators, which is the number on the bottom

1/3+1/3=2/3

hope this !