subject
Mathematics, 31.08.2021 18:10 Redhead667

Alexa wants to use indirect proof to prove that all rectangles are not squares. She first assumes that all rectangles are squares. Alexa then provides the following counterexample to disprove her assumption.
She concludes that all rectangles must not be squares.
Which statement best describes Alexa’s indirect proof?

A. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She followed the steps of an indirect proof in the wrong order.
B. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She made an error in her counterexample.
C. Alexa's proof is correct and contains no errors.
D. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She made an error in her assumption.


Alexa wants to use indirect proof to prove that all rectangles are not squares.

She first assumes

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:40, tatianaware1617
For the function, f(x) = -5x 2, find f(-4).
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:30, destinysmithds7790
Which of the following expressions are equivalent ?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, SakChan8367
Ab based on the given diagram, if m_1 = 60° then m 2 = 30 60 90 180
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00, zurfluhe
Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Alexa wants to use indirect proof to prove that all rectangles are not squares. She first assumes...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 09.11.2019 17:31