I have having a problem with this equation 3(-2-3x) = -9x-4

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

1. preform the indicated operation. then estimate to see whether the proposed result is reasonable. 811.1 - 8.039 803.071 803.061 803.161 831.061 2. the ordered pair (1, 2) lies in which quadrant? quadrant ii quadrant iv quadrant iii quadrant i 3. sean tries to drink 3 liters of water every day how my millimeters of water does he drink in a day? 0.3 ml 0.003 ml 3,000 ml 30 ml 4. find the least common multiple. (lcm). 10, 36 5 180 20 360

On saturday morning, calls arrive at ticketmaster at a rate of 108 calls per hour. what is the probability of fewer than three calls in a randomly chosen minute?