(c) For the median age to rise, is the actual number of children less in 1991 than it was in 1980? Why or why not? (Enter your percentages as a whole number.) Not necessarily but that could be the case. In 1980, % of the population was 30 years old or less. In 1991, % of the population was 33.1 years old or less. On July 1, 1980, the population was about 227.23 million. On July 1, 1991, the population was about 252.98 million. Since half of the population in 1991 was ---Select--- than half of the population in 1980 and the median age in 1991 was greater than the median age in 1980, there could have been ---Select--- children in 1991

srry idk

step-by-step explanation:

javeir earned 56 dollors more than kyle so kyle and javier had 14w but javier made 56 dollors more so 14w plus 56 equals 70w so kyle has 14w

step-by-step explanation: hope i plz give me brainliest with the points so this is not constant cause it says last week so its clearly not every week

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!