Sandra has developed a program designed to increase reading comprehension scores in 6th graders. She randomly selects three students and has them participate in her program. When she compares the mean score from the students who completed her program to three students who did not participate in the program, she finds no significant difference between their mean scores. What is most likely the reason for the non-significant finding

a small sample size

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given in the question, we are informed that Sandra developed a program that was designed to increase reading comprehension scores in 6th graders and she then randomly selects three students and has them participate in her program.

After comparing the mean score from the students who completed her program to three students who did not participate in the program, she finds no significant difference between their mean scores, it should be noted that the reason for this will be because the sample size is small.

If a large sample size was used, this could have been different as thsi could result in a significant difference between their mean scores.

there has been genes found in the x chromosome of males that have been linked to [homo/hetero]sexuality. in addition to the reign of the x chromosome, a section of chromosome 8 has also been link to, "alot of ppl are so " these facts were proven true after a 2014 study of a gay male and his strait brother. according to newscientist.com,"chromosome 14 and is mainly active in the thyroid, but also the brain. called tshr, it makes a type of receptor protein that recognises and binds to a hormone that stimulates the thyroid. in this way, the gene plays an important role in controlling thyroid function. the fact that tshr seems to be involved in sexual orientation fits with evidence that thyroid function seems to be linked to sexuality."

in conclusion, "ppl are so gay" due to their genetics.