I don't understand this at all ( PICTURE ) please help with a simple explanation if you can. 15 Points and Marking Brainliest, Reporting fakes.

Which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Refer to the table below if needed. second quadrant third quadrant fourth quadrant sin(1800- - cos(180° -) tan(180°-e) =- tane cot(1800-0) 10 it to solo 888 sin(180° +c) = - sine cos(180° +) =- cose tan(180° +c) = tane cot(180° +o) = cote sec(180° + c) = - seco csc(180° +2) = - csce sin(360° -) =- sine cos(360° -) = cose tan(360° - e) =- tane cot(360° -) = -cote sec(360° -) = seco csc(360° -) = csco sec(180° -) = csc(180° -) = csca 1991 given that sine = 3/5 and lies in quadrant ii, find the following value. tane

1mile equals approximately 1.6 kilometers. which best approximates the number of miles in 6 kilometers?