A square is reflected across the y -axis, then translated 3 units down to form a second square. Are the two squares congruent, and why?
O They are congruent because a reflection and a translation are both rigid motions.
O They are congruent because neither a reflection nor a translation is a rigid motion.
O They are not congruent because a reflection is not a rigid motion, even though a translation is rigid.
O They are not congruent because a translation is not a rigid motion, even though a rotation is rigid.

percentage - 25%

probability - 0.25

we know,

total amount of students in class = 20

total boys = 10

total girls = 10

no of girls who wear glasses = 10/2 = 5

probability of choosing a girl with glasses is =

number of girls wearing glasses/total number of students in the class = 5/20

thus, percentage of selecting a girl wearing glasses will be

= 5/20 × 100

= 5 × 5

25%

therefore,

probability will be 0.25

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v

yes

step-by-step explanation: