subject
Mathematics, 14.05.2021 23:00 nakeytrag

In order to obtain a linear relationship between predictor and response variable, you had to transform the response variable (Y) using a natural log transformation. After running the regression your estimate of the slope is 0.30011. Because you transformed the response variable the slope is no longer the change in Y, measured in the original units, per unit change in the predictor X. Using a simple mathematical expression you can still interpret the slope. Following the expression used in the lecture, the correct interpretation is now that this is a change in Y per unit change in X. And the value of this change is

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:02, bl6659
275/20 simplified (lmbo it told me to add more characters)
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:00, 19jcormier
Marcus built a model car that is 4 inches wide. what scale was used to build the car if the actual width of the car is 6 feet? a. 1 in. = 2 ftb. 1 in. = 2.5 ftc. 1 in. = 1.5 ftd. 1 ft = 1.5 in.
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30, maddiemalmstrom
Adiverr from the university of florida women’s swimming and diving team is competing in the ncaa zone b championships
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, ahrensy8444
Lucy and donavan measured the length of the school garden. lucys measurement is 11.3m and donavans measurement is 113 cm. could both be correct? explain
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In order to obtain a linear relationship between predictor and response variable, you had to transfo...

Questions in other subjects: