subject
Mathematics, 05.05.2021 17:00 tristanortonubca

Which statement best explains whether or not a calculator is the most efficient way to simplify (0.68 – 0.38 – 0.2) × 2.3? Multiplying the amount in the parentheses by 2.3 will be a time-consuming process, so using a calculator would most likely be more efficient.
Some of the decimals are to the tenths digit and others are to the hundredths, so using a calculator would most likely be more efficient.
The calculations inside the parentheses are easily done by hand and yield a value easily multiplied by 2.3, so finding the solution by hand would most likely be more efficient.
Multiplying any number by 2.3 can be done quickly by hand, so solving this problem by hand would most likely be more efficient.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, Chen5968
The distribution of the amount of money spent by students for textbooks in a semester is approximately normal in shape with a mean of $235 and a standard deviation of $20. according to the standard deviation rule, how much did almost all (99.7%) of the students spend on textbooks in a semester?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, kfliehman1
Which must be true in order for the relationship △zyv ~ △xwv to be correct? zy ∥ wx ∠z ≅ ∠y and ∠w ≅ ∠x zv ≅ vy and wv ≅ vx ∠z ≅ ∠x and ∠w ≅ ∠y
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00, edisonsitesuper9312
Joey is asked to name a quadrilateral that is also a rhombus and has 2 pairs of parallel sides. should be his answer
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30, amayax77
Find │–14│ a. 14 b. –14 c. start fraction 1 over 14 end fraction
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which statement best explains whether or not a calculator is the most efficient way to simplify (0.6...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 13.07.2020 19:01