How can we explain why this identity must be true?

ln(2) = -ln(1/2)

hey seth! : )

i’m not 100% sure, but i think it’s b

hope this ya : p

miss u!

- nicole

a reflection across the x-axis , followed by the by a reflection across the y-axis , and then a scale dilation of 0.5 .

yes, gavin is right.

step-by-step explanation:

gavin is correct. 

this problem is about converting 9% per year to how many percent per quarter. the rate is still the same. it only differed in the time period. so, through dimensional analysis,

9% per year  × (1 year / 4 quarters) = 2.25% per quarter

if he was asked to convert 9% per year to how many percent per quarter  compounded quarterly, then you will not simply divide by four. this is because compounding is not linear.

hope this , have a good day. c;