Identify the conclusion for this hypothesis test. A. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There isis sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that 33​% of users develop nausea. B. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There isis sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that 33​% of users develop nausea. C. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There is notis not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that 33​% of users develop nausea. D. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There is notis not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that 33​% of users develop nausea.

7 ft 6 in means 7 1/2, because 6 in is 1/2 of a foot. 7 ft 8 in means 7 2/3 because 8 in is 2/3 of a foot. 23/3 = 7 2/3. 15/2 = 7 1/2.

23/3   *   15/2   = 57 1/2

step-by-step explanation:

x=6 and x=3

beep beep imma sheep

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

step-by-step explanation:

circumference divided by 3.141592654 then timesthe radius twice