An ideologue is certain that his position is correct. New evidence is emerging that challenges this position. There is only a 0.01% chance of such evidence emerging if the position is correct. However, there is an 95% chance of such evidence emerging if the position is not correct. Now, after such evidence has emerged, if the ideologue is Bayesian, how should this new evidence impact his position – how certain to be correct (expressed as a posterior probability) is he now? Blank 1. Fill in the blank, read surrounding text.

0.84 dang lotta people are looking for this lol or if you round up its 1 but the overall answer to that is 0.84

step-by-step explanation:

g = (2, 2)

step-by-step explanation:

given the ratio is 1 : 1 then f is the midpoint of eg

let the coordinates of g = (x, y)

using the midpoint formula

(0 + x) = 1 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

0 + x = 2 ⇒ x = 2

similarly

(4 + y) = 3 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

4 + y = 6 ( subtract 4 from both sides )

y = 2

coordinates of g = (2, 2)

the correct answer is a.) bc< mn 5 stars if this you : )

step-by-step explanation:

a, b, c, d are correct.

step-by-step explanation:

we have g(x) = 3 and are required to find which option is a translation of g(x).

now, 'translation' is a transformation which means to shift the function in any direction and the general form of translation is g(x) + k, where k is any real number.

so, according to the options we see that all are correct as they satisfy the general form of translation.

also, it can be seen from the graph below that the function g(x) = 3 is shifted from its position in all the four options.