subject
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 01:00 lllamasarebae3061

Solve by Elimination:
3x - 5y = -7
-4x + 7y = 8

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:00, jfarley259
Hye ryung is the president of the local chapter of the american medical students association (amsa). she is organizing local outreach and informational meetings. at her first meeting there are five people present (including herself). every month after that her group grows by 5 people. a. how many members are in the group after 6 months? b. the logistics of hosting and feeding her group at meetings was more complicated than expected. the cost of feeding 5 people at her first meeting was $30, for 10 people it was $35, for 15 it was $45, and after 6 months all of the costs had added up to $100. write a function to model the cost with the number of people attending meetings. c. what connections can you make between the linear growth of the group’s membership and the increasing costs of running meetings?
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:20, queentynaisa
Which is the equation of an ellipse with directrices at x = ±4 and foci at (2, 0) and (−2, 0)?
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, andrewblack033
In the following diagram it is given that dec, ab || dc, ad || eb, and ad is congruent to bc. a)why isn't abc a parallelogram even though it has a pair of parallel sides and a pair of congruent sides b)explain why be must be congruent to bc. further explain what type of triangle this makes triangle abc and what it tells you about angle 1 and angle 2c) finally why must angle 3 be congruent to angle 1? further, explain why we know that angle 3 is congruent to angle 2
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40, rivera8
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Solve by Elimination:
3x - 5y = -7
-4x + 7y = 8...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Social Studies, 03.04.2020 19:02