subject
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 08:52 emilystartk

Tyesha found that the z-statistic was 2.1 and that the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96. which of the following is a valid conclusion based on these results?

a) one can reject the null hypothesis.

b) one can reject the alternate hypothesis.

c) one can accept the null hypothesis.

d) one cannot accept or reject the null hypothesis.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00, hello6975
Which statement about the relative areas of δabc and δxyz is true? the area of δabc > the area of δxyz the area of δabc < the area of δxyz the area of δabc = the area of δxyz more information is needed to compare.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30, magicpuppydance
On #16 : explain how factoring a trinomial, ax^2+ bx+ c, when a does not equal 1 different from factoring a trinomial when a = 1.
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00, zurfluhe
Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:40, Quidlord03
Which is the scale factor proportion for the enlargement shown?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Tyesha found that the z-statistic was 2.1 and that the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96. which...

Questions in other subjects: