Plz i am stuck!
which counterexample disproves the conjecture?
a student concludes that if x is a real number, then x2> x
a: x=3
b: x=-2
c: x=-1
d: x=1

which counterexample disproves the conjecture?
if a number is a multiple of 2, then it is a multiple of 6
a: 10
b: 12
c: 15
d: 18

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.