Acertain naturopathic remedy being tested may be effective in increasing the life expectancy in people who have a rare disease. a control group consists of 25 subjects who have not taken the remedy and have a mean life expectancy of 72.1 years. a treatment group of the same size have been given the remedy have a mean life expectancy of 75.2 years. after re-randomizing through simulation the distribution plot for the differences of means is shown.
what is the margin of error, rounded to the nearest hundredth, and is the naturopathic remedy effective in increasing the life expectancy of people with this rare disease?
a. m. e.= 5.74 and no, the remedy is not effective in increasing the life expectancy in people because the original difference of means of 3.1 years is statistically within what we would expect if the differences were random
b. m. e.= 2.87 and yes, the remedy is effective in increasing the life expectancy in people because the original difference of means of 3.1 years is statistically beyond what we would expect if the differences were random
c. m. e.= 2.87 and no, the remedy is not effective in increasing the life expectancy in people because the original difference of means of 3.1 years is statistically within what we would expect if the differences were random
d. m. e.= 9.09 and yes, the remedy is effective in increasing the life expectancy in people because the original difference of means of 3.1 years is statistically beyond what we would expect if the differences were random