Each interior angle of the regular n-gon has a measure of 140

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Solve for n? [tex]z = \frac{3}{4} mn[/tex]

Ascatter plot with a trend line is shown below. which equation best represents the given data? y = x + 2 y = x + 5 y = 2x + 5