What is -3x + 2/4 + 1 =5 solve for x!

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which equation represents a direct linear variationa. y=x2b. y=2/5xc. y=1/xd. y=x+3

Of f(x) is byof f(x)=-3|x| x-.f(x)? a )f(x)=3|x| b) f(x)=|x+3| c) f(x)= -3|x| d) f(x)= -|x+3|