Zoe tried to prove that \triangle AED \cong \triangle CEB△AED≅△CEBtriangle, A, E, D, \cong, triangle, C, E, B. Statement Reason 1 \angle A \cong \angle C∠A≅∠Cangle, A, \cong, angle, C Given 2 \angle DEA \cong \angle BEC∠DEA≅∠BECangle, D, E, A, \cong, angle, B, E, C Given 3 \overline{AE} \cong \overline{EC} AE ≅ EC start overline, A, E, end overline, \cong, start overline, E, C, end overline Given 4 \triangle AED \cong \triangle CEB△AED≅△CEBtriangle, A, E, D, \cong, triangle, C, E, B Angle-side-angle congruence What is the first error Zoe made in her proof?

"a" determine whether sage found the correct quotient. show your work

step-by-step explanation:

answer: a. 13/44

step-by-step explanation: judging by the information given to us, we are looking for experimental probability. we can see that 13 males have chosen chocolate ice cream. there are 44 ice creams in total (remember that the total is always the denominator). so our answer is 13/44.

δabc ≅ δdcb by sas because

db ≅ ac . . given (side)

bc ≅ bc . . reflexive property (side)

∠dbc ≅ ∠ acb . . alternate interior angles where transversal bc crosses parallel lines bd and ac (included angle)