Phillip is asked to solve the following inequality: 6. 3x > 6 -
His work:
6- 3x > 6
-6. -6
——————-
-3x > 0
——. ——
-3. -3
x > 0
Reminder: There is a line under the >.
Did Philip solve the inequality correctly? If not, where in the solution did Philip make an error?

(The second -6 is under 6. Please answer)

step-by-step explanation: a reaction is first order. if the initial reactant concentration is 0.0200 m, and 25.0 days later the concentration is 6.25 x 10-4 m, then its half-life is:

step-by-step explanation:

use context clues to figure out the meaning of the bolded word:  

the sage gardener knew when she had to water her plants.  

question 8 options:

mint plant

wise

happy

lazy