James conducted an experiment with 4 possible outcomes. he determined that the experimental probability of event a happening is 10 out of 50. the theoretical probability of event a happening is 1 out of 4. which action is most likely to cause the experimental probability and theoretical probabilities for each event in the experiment to become closer?

Here, the experimental probability and the theoretical probability differs.

The things that may have an impact on it are:

a) There are things that may not be considered or simplified in the theoretical model, like the temperature, atmospheric pressure, material used, etc.

So you can try to take this thing in your theoretical model and correct it, with the objective of finding a new theoretical probability of the event A, that may be closer to the experimental one.

b) You may not do enough repetitions of the experiment, with enough repetitions, the mean of the probability may skew a little bit towards the theoretical probability.

image result for what is another name for consecutive interior angles? ​

when two lines are crossed by another line (called the transversal): the pairs of angles on one side of the transversal but inside the two lines are called consecutive interior angles. in this example, these are consecutive interior angles: d and f.

step-by-step explanation:

so far i think you have the right thing going for you just remember soh cah toh

step-by-step explanation:

sine over hypotenuse

cosine   equals adjacent

tangent over hypotenuse